Campaign StatusVictory Achieved

Pipeline Litigation. Proven Results.

In September 2025, Rubinson Law obtained a sweeping Temporary Injunction in Montgomery County, Texas, halting above-ground activity at the Blackfin Conroe Compressor Station. Within weeks, Blackfin issued a relocation notice—confirming the power of decisive litigation strategy.

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Update
Compressor Station Relocated. The Blackfin Conroe Compressor Station was moved following the injunction. The page now serves as a permanent results showcase and information resource.
Key Result
Temporary Injunction

Granted by the Montgomery County District Court on September 15, 2025, broadly enjoining above-ground compressor activities near Bartholet Home Furnishings.

Rapid Outcome
Relocation

Blackfin issued a relocation notice on October 8, 2025, following the injunction—averting immediate risk to nearby properties.

Expanded Relief
Clarification Denied

On October 28, 2025, the Court denied Blackfin’s Motion for Clarification and enjoined all production and development on the property as to remaining pipeline appurtenances.

Case Timeline

From Filing to Relocation

Aug–Sept 2025
Community outreach, evidence build, and enforcement of restrictive covenants governing use of the defendant’s property to prevent incompatible industrial use near a retail center.
Sep 15, 2025
Temporary Injunction entered—broadly enjoining above-ground compressor-station activity adjacent to Bartholet Home Furnishings.
Oct 6, 2025
Blackfin noticed an accelerated appeal; no stay was sought.
Oct 8, 2025
Blackfin sent relocation notice to the City—moving the compressor station away from the business district.
Oct 28, 2025
Court denied Blackfin’s Motion for Clarification and enjoined all production and development on the property as to remaining pipeline appurtenances.
Case Study

Bartholet Properties v. Blackfin Conroe Compressor Station

Our client—a multigenerational retail family operating in Conroe for over twenty years—faced the siting of a high-pressure compressor station approximately 137 feet from their established store. The case centered on enforcement of a restrictive covenant governing the use of the defendant’s property, which prohibited industrial and compressor-station activity of this nature.

By focusing on the plain terms and intent of the covenant, we demonstrated that Blackfin’s planned compressor-station use violated clear property restrictions designed to protect adjacent commercial operations. The injunction and subsequent rulings upheld the enforceability of those protections.

Result: The injunction, relocation, and subsequent clarification ruling safeguarded the Bartholet family business and affirmed the strength of property-based relief in pipeline disputes.

“We are deeply thankful to our attorney, Seth Rubinson, the Court, and our community for their unwavering support.”
— The Bartholet Family
For Communities & Businesses

Within a Pipeline Impact Radius?

If your property lies within a Potential Impact Radius (PIR) of proposed pipeline facilities, early strategy is everything. We combine injunction-ready pleadings, engineering affidavits, and restrictive covenant analysis to secure timely relief before commissioning risk becomes unavoidable.